Skip to content

Conversation

@vincentsarago
Copy link

@vincentsarago vincentsarago commented Feb 5, 2020

closes #160

To Do

  • write tests

cc @ionelmc

@vincentsarago vincentsarago marked this pull request as ready for review March 23, 2020 02:15
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 23, 2020

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 77.95276% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 69.86%. Comparing base (dafa578) to head (56906bc).
⚠️ Report is 145 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/pytest_benchmark/storage/s3.py 80.48% 18 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
src/pytest_benchmark/utils.py 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #161      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.80%   69.86%   +2.06%     
==========================================
  Files          16       17       +1     
  Lines        1792     1918     +126     
  Branches      317      340      +23     
==========================================
+ Hits         1215     1340     +125     
+ Misses        497      491       -6     
- Partials       80       87       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@vincentsarago
Copy link
Author

@ionelmc Sorry about the failing tests 🤦‍♂ hope the last commit will pass 🤞

@vincentsarago
Copy link
Author

Woaa, until yesterday I didn't know about iSort ... and now I understand why the tests were failling. Sorry about this @ionelmc . I hope it will be fine now

@ncclementi
Copy link

@vincentsarago Is this something still in the works? We are evaluating using pytest benchmark and having S3 storage would be a great pro.

@vincentsarago
Copy link
Author

@ncclementi it worked when I worked on this PR 😄
I haven't used it in a while so if there has been any update on the library this PR may need some update

@ncclementi
Copy link

@vincentsarago Yes, I noticed the branch has conflicts, but I'm not sure what's the maintainer's intention in getting this implemented. The PR seems to be very close to done, but it's been a while. Maybe @ionelmc can comment on it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add AWS S3 or HTTP storage

3 participants